The most popular three networks are integrated int

  • Detail

Three fusion two-way access to urban residents saves 500 yuan per year. The three fusion, which has been tangled for more than ten years, suddenly accelerated in 2010, and then poured cold water on the cheering enthusiasm just ignited in the industry. Shortly after the executive meeting of the State Council decided at the beginning of the year to accelerate the integration of telecommunications, radio and television, and the Internet, and considered and adopted the overall plan to promote the integration of the three, Guangxi Radio and television stopped IPTV, which shocked the industry in one fell swoop and sharply lowered the expectations of all social parties for achieving a breakthrough in the quality of the integration of the three within the year

for a while, the competition between radio and television with favorable policies and telecommunications with a mature degree of industrialization became the focus of attention. The analysis shows that in the early stage of the three integration, the mode of radio and television entering telecommunications is the main mode, and radio and television has the dominant power. In the short term, the development of IPTV still needs the broadcasting and television departments to issue clear policies. Relevant radio and television experts also admitted that the broadband competition is not sufficient and radio and television needs to join. Competition seems to be the ultimate topic of "Three Combinations"

in the heated debate among all parties, few people complain about the original intention of the three integration. When technology has not become the biggest bottleneck of China's "three integration", nothing can constitute the main features and general trend of "three integration" better than the complementary advantages and mutual penetration of all parties in the industrial chain; When the market and people's demand for information technology and converged applications is growing, nothing can better reflect the true purpose and big goal of the three convergences than vigorously promoting the development of IPTV and power, because their hosts are the same, value-added applications, high-definition television, VoIP network or video, network video, terminal payment and other services

three convergence needs to break monopoly: Radio and television resistance becomes the biggest problem

the misunderstanding of three convergence in the industry is not without reason. Before and after the "three convergence" policy, the relationship between radio, television and telecommunications has always been the most market-oriented. "Harmony" has not yet been clearly defined, and contradictions continue to intensify. In the broadband market, the competition between the three leading operators and various virtual operators involved has been quite sufficient. The radio, television and television monopoly that frequently exposes troubles has become the biggest problem of the three convergence

at the end of last month, the State Administration of radio, film and television (SARFT) issued an announcement on its official website entitled "Guangxi investigates and punishes Guangxi Telecom's unauthorized IP TV business violations according to law", and then issued the "urgent notice on investigating and punishing Guangxi Telecom's unauthorized IP TV business according to law". As of February 12, all IP TV program signal sources and services of telecom companies in 14 cities of Guangxi Province have been stopped

almost at the same time, SARFT also issued the notice that Shanghai TV station immediately stopped providing IPTV program signal sources to Guangxi and Xinjiang telecom companies. As of March 1, IPTV signals in Xinjiang have also been completely interrupted

although it is rare to make such a public "challenge", telecom people are more worried that this will be a prelude to the same fate as Guangxi and Xinjiang in many provinces and cities carrying out IPTV services in China? Squeeze out expansion - no matter when, after all, the "monopoly" attitude of the radio and Television Department on the issue of "three integration" has a long history. Since 2005, the disputes about digital TV conversion have been evident. As the first province in China to complete the overall conversion of 1million digital TV users, consumers' complaints have never stopped in Guangxi

the same problem also occurs on IPTV and Internet TV. For ordinary people, the attitude of radio and television towards IPTV means that this program receiving method with on-demand and callback functions has not been fully popularized so far; The strict control over Internet TV licenses by radio and television means that consumers will only see programs based on TV copyright when they buy Internet TV for a long time in the future

tri fusion is also not a monopoly breaking tool: "1+1>2" is the positive solution.

tri fusion is not born for competition or non competition. The non spraying team has adopted special structure effect powder and unique powder surface treatment process. It is conservatively estimated that if we speed up the complementary advantages of telecommunications and radio and television, each urban household can save at least fourorfive yuan in expenditure each year, and the state can save at least tens of billions of yuan in repeated investment. Industry experts even predict that improving the efficiency of "three integration" will reduce China's repeated construction funds by about 200billion yuan per year

therefore, there is another view that the "three integration" should be a tool to break the market monopoly. As early as last August, when China Mobile Suzhou Branch launched the preferential activity of "charging for broadband", the customer service staff of Suzhou mobile 10086 said that the activity used the "wired" broadband that China Mobile had previously cooperated with radio and television, which was understood by the industry as China Mobile's cooperation with radio and television to break the original monopoly of the broadband market, which was obviously another misreading of the original intention of the three convergence. It is true that the "three convergence" is conducive to competition, promote the healthy development of the information industry, break all forms of monopoly, and better serve the people and economic and social development. However, if the "three convergence" is only a tool for breaking competition and the so-called monopoly, it will not only disappoint the ice breaking determination of the policy, but also completely defeat the long-term development of China's informatization and the integration needs of people's information life

as Fu Liang, a telecom expert, said, the "three convergence" requires cooperation between telecom and radio and television, and complementary resources to form a "1 + 1> 2" situation. If each family "stares at what is in its own bowl" and "ponders what is in the other's bowl", even if two-way entry is realized, the actual result is likely to be "1 + 1 <1"

three convergence should focus on the integration application business required by people's livelihood and industry.

what is the original intention and essence of three convergence? Premier Wen Jiabao of the State Council pointed out in his government work report at the third session of the 11th National People's Congress on March 5 that substantive progress should be made in actively promoting the "three" integration and accelerating the R & D and application of IOT. In words, the starting point and purpose of "three fusion" should be based on the information fusion application required by the broadest people's livelihood and the informatization process of the industry

iptv, TV, value-added applications, high-definition TV, VoIP network or video, network video, terminal payment and other application services should be regarded as the current and future market opportunities of the three convergence, and also become the positive solution of the three convergence goals

it is reported that at the press conference jointly held by Chinatelecom Zhejiang and Zhejiang satellite TV on March 1, Zhejiang satellite TV, star blue Zhejiang live TV alliance and Chinatelecom recently applied the newly developed 3G transmission technology to live TV broadcast for the first time in China, which is also an innovative measure in response to the country to accelerate the promotion of three integration

according to wuxiaowei, deputy general manager of Chinatelecom Zhejiang company, the application of 3G transmission technology to live TV broadcasting and the real-time transmission of shooting scenes to TV stations through 3G signals can not only make up for the shortcomings of the current satellite transmission, optical cable and digital microwave transmission systems, such as high cost, huge system and complex operation, but also make the live TV equipment more portable, which is an extension of the application of 3G technology

this is the triple fusion performance that should be paid attention to. When technology and downstream market demand continue to be weak, it has not become the biggest bottleneck of China's "three integration", and nothing can constitute the main features and general trend of "three integration" better than the complementary advantages and mutual penetration of all parties in the industrial chain

as for how to achieve this goal, Professor Kan Kaili of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications stressed that "the premise of two-way business entry is the separation of radio and television stations. Only under the premise of separation of radio and television stations can the state break the separation of interests of local radio and television departments and realize the national integration of radio and television networks. If the separation of radio and television stations can be well implemented, radio, television and telecommunications will naturally enter in two directions." Communication message

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI